So,
a few days ago I talked a bit about the hypocrisy of those who use
morality as a shield to hide their own bigotry. During the post, I
twice made comments about things that would need to be discussed
later, such as why the so called conservative Christians aren't
making a fuss over the way the seven things God hates becoming our
morality, and religion no longer being religion.
What
was I talking about? Quite simply, the bastardization of Christianity
and Objectivism into a single entity that serves the actual purpose
of neither.
For
those who do not know what Objectivism is, it would take a while to
explain. The short version is that it is the philosophy of Ayn Rand,
author of Atlas Shrugged. In a nutshell, it is the argument that the
only true morality is that of selfishness. It's a lot more than that,
but that's the quick and dirty explanation.
Over
the last fifty years or so, the founding principles of Christianity
have been interwoven with those of Objectivism, creating something
new and rather unholy to my mind. Mostly because the two things have
nothing in common, and in fact are petty much opposites of each
other. The purpose behind this I cannot guess at, but if I was to,
I'd say it's some sort of misguided attempt to blend two separate
ways of life into something stupid.
First
off, let me just say that I have no problem with either philosophy.
What people want to believe is up to them. I could care less.
However, when others begin pushing their beliefs onto me, I tend to
get a little testy about it. Of late, this has become a big deal for
me, and is often the source of much of my anger.
Now,
for the part that is going to pretty well piss off everyone. Or at
least, I hope so. So long as it gets them thinking, I could care less
if they are pissed.
I'm
going to start with the Republicans, because they are the ones most
guilty of this. Democrats are guilty of other, equally bad, things.
Just not the things I'm focusing on right this minute. We'll get to
those assholes in a bit though.
My
best for instance would be Paul Ryan, Americas leading cocksucker.
This guy is one of the people who seems to think there is no conflict
between Christianity and Objectivism, which only shows how stupid he
actually is. When you cherry pick the parts you like and ignore the
parts you don't from a set of ideals it doesn't mean you are smart.
It means you are lazy.
In
general, Republicans push the idea of deregulation, which is a
guiding principle of Objectivism. Adherents of the philosophy oppose
anti-trust laws, minimum wage laws, child labor laws, and public
education. On the first three, it's because they endorse
laissez-faire capitalism, or at least, that's the easy explanation.
The
more complex reasoning is that part of Rand's belief was that
thinking, rational, intelligent people would logically conclude that
these laws were unnecessary, due to other thinking, rational,
intelligent people not doing things that would require it. The entire
argument is based on the theory that business leaders would deduce
the best possible means of building a strong work force was to treat
them fairly and equitably.
It
is a naive argument, based on idealism. Greed is good has become the
motto of the business leaders, and they are not thinking, rational,
intelligent people. They are stupid, greedy people who care not for
logic, and think nothing of of using people as a resource. Not as a
human resource, but just as a resource, expended and discarded when
no longer of use.
The
reason those laws exist is because that has always been the way of
things. It is to prevent those practices, which rob people of the
opportunity to progress and become successful as well, limiting
wealth and power to the hands of a small few.
In
fact, those laws are based in the Christian philosophy of how the
less fortunate are to be treated. Don't believe me? Let's look at a
quote from the sacred holy book, shall we?
Deuteronomy
15:7 ~ If there is a poor man among your brothers in any of the towns
of the land that the LORD your God is giving you, do not be
hardhearted or tightfisted toward your poor brother.
Psalm
82:3 ~ Defend the cause of the weak and fatherless; maintain the
rights of the poor and oppressed.
Proverbs
14:21 ~ He who despises his neighbor sins, but blessed is he who is
kind to the needy.
Proverbs
17:5 ~ He who mocks the poor shows contempt for their Maker; whoever
gloats over disaster will not go unpunished.
I'm
not going to tear into Pat Robertson on that last one right now.
Maybe later, but for now the fuckface can go about his vile business.
This
could go on for a while. The Bible is pretty clear on how the
fortunate should treat the less fortunate. Actually, it's very damn
exact in it. So, then, why do we see people who claim to be
Christians endorsing ideology that is in direct contradiction to
this, ideas that are pure naive Objectivism?
Easy
answer, because they make money off it. Complex answer, because they
are neither true Christians nor true Objectivists. They are taking
bits and pieces from both philosophies in order to create a new
outlook that makes no sense to the reasoning individual.
Funny
part of this? Rand herself would have been outraged. As would Christ.
Speaking
of Rand, she was also against abortion laws. Makes you wonder how
they reconcile the person they often quote and look up to with the
laws they pass. Of course, when you get down to it, the Bible doesn't
say much about abortion either. Actually, most of the arguments
against abortion that invoke the Bible do so indirectly, because
there is nothing direct about it.
So
why the giant push? Why the pro-life crowd? I mean, morally, sure, I
can get their argument. However, what I can't get is how the same
people who espouse a limited government, individual liberty argument,
as Rand put forward, can turn around and misquote the Bible in
support for legislating an entire country of womens uterus’s. I
mean, come on, talk about conflicting arguments!
That's
the whole thing though. The entire Republican argument, every aspect
of it, is built on conflicting principles that when exposed to logic,
don't hold up for a second. The fact that they say the government
should not be involved in peoples business, but then turn around and
try to pass laws that invade womens bodies, and gays bedrooms, makes
the exact opposite statement of their intent.
The
first half of their argument comes from a warped view of Objectivism,
but the actions they take come from a perverted form of Christianity.
They are neither one, nor the other. Which is what makes them
dangerous, as they have actually abandoned the morals of both
philosophies.
I
might not agree with Rand's view of morality, but at least it was
still considerate towards peoples rights. The same could be said of
Christian morals. Modern Republicans show no consideration towards
the rights of anyone, because they have completely abandoned all
moral standing in the two opposing philosophies they have adopted.
The
best example of this I can think of is that Rand taught opposition
towards censorship of any kind, including worship. Not just Christian
worship, but ALL worship. She honestly believed that even people who
held different views from her had the right to express and follow
their beliefs. This same idea is even enshrined in the Constitution
of the United States, long before Rand came along, proving that this
idea is not only far from new, but pretty much a basic tenant of
freedom.
Yet,
every time I turn around, I'm seeing attempts to turn Christianity
into the sole allowed religion of the US. Again, by the same people
who hold Rand up as their idol! How in the world do you do that? How
to warp your thinking to the point that you can accept that kind of
contradiction of thought?
How,
as John Stewart once asked, do you live with that kind of cognitive
dissonance?
The
answer is actually very simple, and to me at least, frightening. All
morality, and even pretext to it, has been abandoned. This is the
only explanation for how people can cherry pick the aspects of two
disparate ideologies in the manner they have.
Limited
government, unless you are a minority, gay, non-Christian, or a
woman, then we are all up in your business in every possible way.
When
words and actions contradict, that is the definition of hypocrisy.
Any time you hear someone claim to be a devout Christian, then
endorse ideas that are pure Objectivism, you can rest assured, they
have no morality, and as such, are liars and hypocrites. Take it to
the bank, boys and girls.
Meanwhile,
Democrats are the alleged socialist, the nanny state manufactures,
who are going to take away all our rights and condemn us to some sort
of collectivist nightmare dystopia. Please. Don't make me laugh.
These guys are all pinheaded idiots who are so busy worrying about
who they may have upset, they couldn't possibly be planning a world
coup.
No,
seriously, look, these guys, they like to talk, but when it comes
time to act, all they can do is sit around and worry. They are
spineless cowards. They aren't some fearsome machine of communism.
They can't even get all their little cogs to mesh long enough to
accomplish a single blessed thing.
This
is the problem with Democrats, and by proxy, liberals and
progressives. They are all too worried about hurting peoples
feelings, about making sure they have convinced every single mother
loving person that they are right, to actually DO anything. They are
the people that form committees to see if they need to form to
committees to advise committees on what committees need to be formed.
In
other words, they are fucking pansies. Stop worrying about what they
are doing, because they aren't doing a damn thing. That's the
problem. All their little touchy feely politically correct, everybody
is special in their own way bullshit won't let them actually do
anything.
Not
until they make sure every single person feels good about themselves,
and about what they are all going to do.
I
mean, why else do you think the Republicans have had such an easy
time of dominating the political scene, when they only control a
freaking third of the government? Because they know all they have to
do is be sullen and disagreeable, and the fucking liberals will fall
apart trying to appease them. And hey, look, it works too.
Say
no, and watch the Democrats turn themselves inside out, sell out
every principle they hold, every moral they cherish, every value they
have, to make the Republicans like them, and agree with them.
Seriously,
what the hell are you people worried about?
Here's
what you should be worried about. Our nation, which holds influence
over the world as a whole, is run by crybaby pansies, and immoral
hypocrites. How the fuck are you not concerned about that?
Oh,
cause your a Libertarian? Go fuck yourself. Those guys are even worse
than the immoral Republicans. They'll sacrifice the rights of every
single person in the country if it means they get what they want.
Selfish cocksucking traitors is what they are. Don't give me your
crap about the Constitution either. The Amendment process was created
specifically to update the Constitution as times changed, to address
issues of the future that the founding fathers could not foresee.
They put into our guiding principles the ability to adapt to a
changing world for a reason.
Saying
we should just stick with what they wrote is the same as saying we
should all still be living in the late 1700's, which in case you
missed it, is the stupidest idea ever. Besides, I'll take you back to
the part, earlier in this post, where I pointed out how ruthless and
greedy corporations abused their rights, forcing the government to
get involved.
What
Libertarians, who are true Objectivists, and I applaud them for at
least being that, are missing is that every time the government has
gotten involved, it was because it had no choice. We didn't end up
where we are because the government is evil. Government is an idea, a
theoretical construct. It is the people running it who are the
problem, not the institution.
By
the way, the Constitution was pretty clear that this was the
governments job to see to the well being of the public, which is the
only right it needs to pass laws that you think are nanny state over
reach. Allow me to refresh your obviously limited, idiotic memories.
U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8 ~ The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.
Don't
argue it. Don't tell me what it really means. General fucking welfare
is pretty fucking clear. Now stop being a pedantic ass ferrat.
So,
what are we to do? If the whole of our governing officials is made up
of immoral hypocrites, spineless wimps, and idiots, where does that
leave us, we the people?
Simple
answer? Fucked, that's where.
Complex
answer? Beats the hell out of me. I'm just an madman with a keyboard,
pointing out whats wrong. I never said I had any answers. I don't.
Though,
I suspect, that ultimately, the answer will lie in how we chose to
deal with these people. After all, we have the ability to vote them
out of office. It's easy to do. We just have to stop and think.
Which, by the way, is one spot where I do agree whole heatedly with
Ayn Rand.
Reason
is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not
count on them. Leave them alone. ~ Ayn Rand